Smart Security Council? Analyzing the effectiveness of targeted sanctions

Smart Security Council? Analyzing the effectiveness of targeted sanctions

4.11 - 1251 ratings - Source

In 2004 the United Nations Security Council initiated a a€œWorking Group on General Issues of Sanctionsa€ in order to increase the Councila€™s effectiveness in terms of sanctions implementation. With this reform, the Council reacted to the harsh criticism from the UN against the conventional sanctions practice. It was the Security Councila€™s latest endeavor to make ratified sanctions more punitive, coercive, and thus effective as far as causing compliance within its judicial framework is concerned. Summarized under the term a€œsmart sanctionsa€, the Security Council tries to be more accurate in addressing sanctions thereby seeking not only to increase political effectiveness, but also to reduce unintended humanitarian suffering. While conventional sanctions are comprehensive and comprised of a variety of measures, such as trade boycotts and embargoes against the entire country, smart or targeted sanctions (as they are also termed) are selective, targeting only at certain areas or individuals. Consequently, sanctions are the practical expression of the Councila€™s sovereignty. The Council a€œlives and breathesa€ through the ratification of sanctions, so their corroboration and proper enforcement reflect the organizationa€™s vitality. In short, if sanctions fail, the Council fails. So far scholars have accentuated technical questions in their research, such as how to engage in a successful bargaining process and how to imply isolation. They further focused on examining the compliance rate of targeted states. What has been slightly ignored is a potentially poor commitment by states to enforce sanctions in the first place. Quite possibly, the Security Council lacks ratification (what I term input legitimacy) and enforcement (what I term output legitimacy) of smart sanctions. Consequently, the a€œeffectivenessa€ of smart sanctions does not necessarily have to be linked to the compliance rate of the targeted state. Instead, it might be connected to the commitment shown by the enforcing member states: the level of legitimacy granted to the Council and its tools. Two questions can be raised: How do member states contribute to the ratification and enforcement of smart sanctions? Has the use of smart sanctions increased the effectiveness of the UNSC as a sanctioning body? The concept of input/output legitimacy serves as a model for analyzing the member statesa€™ commitment and will to impose smart sanctions, thus developing an alternative understanding of the term a€œeffectivenessa€. As the cases of Iran and North-Korea reveal, the ratification and enforcement of smart sanctions suffer legitimacy. This has ramifications both theoretically and empirically as it makes the concept of legitimacy a valuable tool for policy makers and reformists while simultaneously exposing substantial weaknesses of the new sanction practice.Adopting its first resolution on the matter in September 2003, the IAEA board called on Tehran to increase its ... -69.pdf 201Basically, a€œIrana#39;s construction of a gas centrifuge-based uranium enrichment facility is currently the main source ofanbsp;...

Title:Smart Security Council? Analyzing the effectiveness of targeted sanctions
Author: Gordon Friedrichs
Publisher:Anchor Academic Publishing (aap_verlag) - 2014-02-01

You must register with us as either a Registered User before you can Download this Book. You'll be greeted by a simple sign-up page.

Once you have finished the sign-up process, you will be redirected to your download Book page.

How it works:
  • 1. Register a free 1 month Trial Account.
  • 2. Download as many books as you like (Personal use)
  • 3. Cancel the membership at any time if not satisfied.

Click button below to register and download Ebook
Privacy Policy | Contact | DMCA